Immaculate Constellation, Moon Dust, and Sean Kirkpatrick

Story

Immaculate Constellation, Moon Dust, and Sean Kirkpatrick


 

There have been several
interesting developments recently into what the officials insist are UAP
reports and what we still think of as UFOs. All this provides us, indirectly,
with additional information about Immaculate Constellation and ongoing covert
investigations.

According to Matthew
Phelan, the Senior Science Reporter for the Daily Mail, Dr. Sean
Kirkpatrick, who was until recently the man in charge of AARO, revealed what he
described as a new government program to recover alleged alien technology in
the event of a shoot down. I believe he mentioned shoot down in reference to
the Chinese balloon that flew over a great deal of North America recently. I
don’t think he was referring to shooting down an alien spacecraft, though in
the 1950s, there were orders to do just that.

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick at a poorly attended Senate Hearing. He is sitting
with his back to the camera.


Anyway, the retrieval
program’s protocols covered what he called UAP recoveries that ranged from
balloons to alien technology. This, it was claimed, is the first time that a
government official acknowledged any UFO retrieval program, even if that
retrieval program referred to terrestrially manufactured objects. He suggested the
retrieval program began early in 2023.

But there was a program
called Moon Dust that began in 1957, according to documents recovered by Robert
Todd, Cliff Stone and me, that had, as one of its missions, and I quote, “to
collect and analyze raw intelligence reports from the field of fallen space
debris and objects of unknown origin.” Unknown origin certainly could refer to
craft from off world.

The late Cliff  Stone.


I found this
information in an official US Air Force Message, #54322 and dated December 23,
1957. Although it doesn’t mention Moon Dust specifically, it is clear from the
document that it is describing Moon Dust and the Moon Dust mission involving
UFO information.

Kirkpatrick said, “AARO
is Congressionally directed to come up with not just standard reporting
procedures, but also mitigation and response procedures in the event of a shoot
down or a collection of any sort of UAP.”

But, as earlier
documentation proves, that sort of mandate had already been put into place and
despite Air Force original denials that no program known as Moon Dust existed,
the documentation proved otherwise. And for those who claim that its mission
was directed at recovering what was then Soviet debris, the mention of unknown
origin suggests otherwise. You can read more about Moon Dust in my book, Project
Moon Dust
and here:

http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2021/04/coast-to-coast-am-moon-dust-controversy.html

http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2024/06/moon-dust-documents-online.html

http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2024/03/aaro-and-project-moon-dust.html

http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2018/04/moon-dust-and-4602nd-aiss.html

I should point out
here, that I can demonstrate the UFO connection to Moon Dust. While examining
the Project Blue Book files several years ago, I found reference to Moon Dust
cases. The cases are not very impressive, but are important because they are
labeled “Moon Dust” and reinforce the theory that Moon Dust had a UFO
component. You can read about that here:

http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2013/11/project-moon-dust-revisited.html

I want to acknowledge
that the Air Force, when asked about Moon Dust by US Senator Jeff Bingaman from
New Mexico, the Air Force response was that no such program existed. When
documents, with a clear and established provenance were provided, the Air Force
amended the statement claimed that it did exist, but had never been deployed.
That was not true as other documents proved. There was an added note that the
name Moon Dust had been changed and it was properly classified. That was in
1985. From that point on, there had been no inadvertent disclosures about this
program.

There is another,
important point. There no evidence that this program under whatever the new
name it had been given, had been terminated. We can’t use FOIA because we don’t
know the name in use after Moon Dust, and Immaculate Constellation didn’t begin
until years after this other long ongoing program was discovered. Immaculate
Constellation is not a follow-on project, but a new one invented by those now
charged with UAP research.

But you have to wonder
if this new program doesn’t have a secondary purpose and that is to disguise
what had been learned under Moon Dust and that follow-on project. You don’t
look for another program if you have been told that this is something that
began in 2023.

While these government
officials who have just been tasked with dealing with UAP, who have tried to
sever this new investigation from the history of UFO research, and seem to be
disinterested in that earlier history, aren’t attempting to sidetrack
legitimate questions about alien visitation. They’re looking at it as a new
phenomenon rather than something that it over eighty years old. They don’t need
to worry about the massive stacks of evidence that was accumulated prior to
2017 when the Leslie Kean and Ralph Fromental story was published by the New
York Times
. That earlier information is hidden behind a thick national
security wall and what we are allowed to see now just doesn’t have the impact
of some of those earlier UFO events.

(Note: There is
additional information on this blog. Use a keyword in the search engine to
bring up that information.)

Leave a Comment